The following interview was conducted shortly in
February, 1993, at Gritz's
suburban-style ranch home in a sparsely-populated canyon one hour's drive West from Los
Vegas. Parked in front of his house is a twin-engine Cessna; his other plane was
undergoing repair in San Diego. Gritz was winding down from the 1992 Presidential
Campaign, in which he garnered over 100,000 write-in votes despite seemingly suicidal
decisions, such as refusing to appear on Larry King's television program - the same show
that launched Ross Perot - because Gritz didn't want to disappoint supporters at a Liberty
Lobby luncheon.
Gritz's campaign contrasted his Vietnam War heroics to give credence to his
anti-Federal Government diatribes, in which he accused the CIA of acting in concert with
Pentagon officials for peddling dope for money and influence. He likewise blamed high
officials for deliberately sabotaging several Rambo-like rescues of MIAs. These
revelations apparently turned Gritz into an anti-government activist, and he shared his
information with the Christic Institute and other liberal watchdog groups.
After becoming a sort of folk hero in Idaho by talking Christian Identity believer
Randy Weaver into peacefully surrendering to authorities after federal snipers killed his
wife and son, Gritz decided to create a community named "Almost Heaven" near
Kamiah, Idaho, in which like-minded patriots would construct homes and practice survival
techniques, including preparation for government invasions. Needless to
say, leftist activists, government authorities and the mass media are quick to condemn Gritz's
community as a haven for apocalyptic cultists, another Waco waiting to
happen. Gritz
asserts that his community will strictly observe the Constitution, and is a logical
defense against taking on the mark of the beast and other such impositions created by the
New World Order.
--- Adam Parfrey
Italicised text is Parfrey's
questions.
Normal text is Gritz's answers.
What was your larger purpose in writing Called to Serve?
It's not what we did in Vietnam that's important - there were some lessons to be
learned so we don't repeat them. But the fact that the government has been involved in
illegal narcotics trafficking, literally overdosing our own people, not third world target
audiences, as we would expect, I think is important. If I can get people to understand it
better and accept it better by trying to take them from how I got involved in Special
Forces to current time then so be it.
As an insider or former insider, what precipitated your decision to criticize the
government?
One is common sense, consciousness. On the far right you find people like Dick
Secord.
I know Richard Secord. He was a Major-General in the United States Air
Force. He was a
chief attache and knew the Shah of Iran personally. I worked for Secord's
boss, Erich von Marbod, who still hasn't been uncovered, except when Ed Wilson was determined to have been
a person selling tons of explosives to Qadhafi, and identified both Secord and von Marbod
as conspirators along with Ollie North, everyone got the axe except North. Von Marbod had
to resign his super government position; Secord had to give up being a
General. But it
didn't mean they gave up the business. You have General Secord, who has on public
record.
Playboy magazine, for example, said he deserved the $8 million dollars he made in selling
the Ayatollah Khomeini missiles, for all his hard work. Before the US
Senate, you have
Dick Secord saying he was in business to make money when he was helping the
Contras.
Senator Kerry from Massachusetts asked the question, "I thought you were administered
to help the Contra?!" He said, "Well, couldn't I have two
purposes?"
On the other hand you have - I would cast myself - we do not sell our
services. Our
services are not for sale, they are given freely for what the motto Special Forces
is. We
Liberate the Oppressed. De Oppresso Liber. I have, but not with the same mercenary intent
as Secord, accepted money on contract work for the CIA. For example, I trained Afghan
Mujahadeen. The checks we received were from Stanford Technology. I didn't have any idea
at the time that Stanford Technology was hooked up with Albert Hakim, Ollie
North, Dick
Secord or any of the rest of them.
These checks come to you, you cash them. I was asked to do the training by a trusted
person in the State Department working for the Undersecretary of State for Security
Assistance. When I was a commander for special forces in Latin America I knew Manuel
Antonio Nor-iega personally. I was knowledgeable about Operation
Watchtower. My best friend, A.J. Baker, commanded the first Watchtower
miss-ion, which was CIA aircraft flying [cocaine from Bolivia to Alford Air Force Base in
Panama]. Everyone associated has been
killed except myself. I'm 240 pounds, I've got a 6th degree black belt. I've rained
hair-covered knuckles down upon people and would do so again, properly
provoked. People
aren't disposed to give me threats face-to-face. But the only I guess you could call it a
threat has been a telephone call wherein the person said the Israeli Mossad had figured in
the death of three Special Forces Colonels. There were four who had knowledge of
Watchtower, and I was the last. But nothing has ever happened [to me].
Some, what I
believe to be today, partial to, but not real white supremacist, out in the
Midwest,
called me a couple of times to say, "Bo, watch out, the Israeli Mossad has got an
assassination plan for you." How in the world would this guy know? I worked with the
Mossad, I know them a little bit. There's no way that somebody outside would know what the
inside was doing. I'm still alive, so obviously I haven't been targeted well if I've been
targeted at all.
Was the threatening phone call from a friendly
source?
Well, that one phone call was just from an unknown
source. We'd call them F-6 in the
intelligence vernacular, it's undeterminable. The point is that I had personal knowledge
of CIA drug-trafficking. Not just in Panama. I had when I was a commander on Special
Forces in Southeast Asia. Francis Ford Coppola, in 1975 sent me a letter. I was a
commander of Special Forces Latin America. He wanted to use the photograph in General
William C. Westmoreland's book [A Soldier Reports] showing me with Nurse
Toi kneeling in front of a lot of really mean-looking Cambodian mercenaries as the
headliner for his new movie Apocalypse Now. Colonel Kurtz was commanding a Cambodian army
and I was Major Gritz, and I did command a Cambodian army. Matter of fact I was the first
to do so.
At that time we had knowledge that the CIA was trafficking in illegal narcotics using
Air America, which we over there had our own name for. We called it Air
Opium. It doesn't
mean that the pilots weren't brave people and did a lot of heroic things, because they
did.
But those flying pigs and rice, and there was a lot of
that, they weren't doing it on
their own initiative, this was the government that was mixing the pigs and rice with loads
of opium. As a matter of fact I was surprised and pleased to see the movie Air America
finally come out because it showed for maybe the only time in history where the Pepsi Cola
plant was set up in Laos, not to put mom and pop bottling companies out of business but
rather to do the rather more sophisticated steps of taking opium and morphine into number
four Asian [heroin] hell. Richard Nixon is the person who set [the Pepsi Cola
plant] up
when he lost the election to Jack Kennedy. I hate to say it, I actually voted for
Nixon;
Lieutenants can be forgiven of ignorances like that, I would hope. I thought that Nixon
had more experience, it wasn't that Kennedy was a Catholic. After he lost, he became a
director in the Pepsi Cola bottling company. I think there was a direct relationship
between Pepsi Cola and the Bay of Pigs. That wasn't Kennedy's show, that was Richard
Nixon's show.
I wasn't on my own going into Burma. [Gritz was asked by the Reagan White House to
confirm rumors that Golden Triangle Khun Sa was holding American prisoners of
war.] George
Bush's office asked me to do that. H. Ross Perot was there when it
happened. I found again
that US government officials were still doing [dealing drugs]. I went to Nicaragua at the
invitation of the State Department to look into some special weapons programs during the
Contra situation. Again, here you have illegal narcotics being used to fund what the CIA
thinks is right but yet what Congress says is wrong. The American people don't get a
chance to vote because it is kept under the leaves, and, of course, crime pays when the
President happens to be one of the chief criminals. We've got Bush now who has as of
Christmas exonerated, forgiven and pardoned all the Iran-Contra people.
Why? Not because
he's Santa Claus but because he himself could very well be implicated, and should
be. So
that's fait accompli now. But what isn't completed is the government, the
bureaucracy, the
mechanics who do the wet work, they never change.
The only thing I did see change was when Jimmy Carter took over as
President. He
appointed Stansfield Turner head of CIA. Turner immediately fired Manuel Antonio
Noriega,
saying I won't have a drug smuggler on the payroll of the CIA. While we laughed a lot
because Jimmy Carter had none of the organization of Richard Nixon, yet the remarkable
thing is that the drug smuggling under Jimmy Carter came almost to a halt. And that to me
was remarkable. With all his failings, Billy Beer and loans for Libya, the fact is Jimmy
did one thing right, he brought Stansfield Turner in and Stansfield cleaned house for the
CIA. It hasn't been the same since.
How could Jimmy Carter do something that perhaps
J.F.K. may have been assassinated for?
Who knows? Jimmy Carter was an insider. He was part of Rockefeller's newly-formed
Trilateral Commission in 1973. He was an insider. The answer to that is very
strange. When
you look at Nixon for example, why would they run him out of office? Boy, you really got
to be deep on the inside to understand a lot of those things. Why could Jimmy Carter get
away with cleaning up a little bit of government? It's still a basic mystery to
me, but I
just noticed, it was like the blind man feeling the elephant, from my point of
view, all
of a sudden the government got better, and that was a paradox under the
Democrats. The
government got better under Jimmy Carter.
You speak much about your warrior ethic and nationalistic ethic in the pages of
your autobiography. Is it from that standpoint that you were disillusioned by government
drug running?
Yes. Remember my comparison with Secord and myself. I think Secord's a
mercenary. The
guy would sell his mother if he could make a buck. On the other hand there are soldiers
like myself who are not staff pukes. We didn't come up the ranks slow-stroking the
generals. Instead we came up in the foxholes and the field. We will not sell our
time, our talent, our resources to anyone regardless. But we'll give them, if the cause is
right.
And so I believe that my warrior ethic is going to put me in far better
stead, if there is
a God, than Secord and his cash register ethics. Some day when I prepare to meet my
maker,
and I'm a Christian, I have to answer for everything I've done.
Something had saved me when I came back from Vietnam. I went to the top of a mountain
in Northern Mexico. I had one bullet in my 9 millimeter. I had to come to some kind of
realization. Had all of the loss of life that I had precipitated in
Vietnam, was it excusable? Was it possible? Because I had been an officer in charge of operations wherein
people had died innocently. Villages had died because of the Mac-V rules of engagement
that allowed bombardment and some of the things that I talked about in my
book. The fact
is that, in searching back over all of my time there, there was never once I took a life
just because I had the power. And I think that was very important. Like the
policeman, if
you take life and you do it needlessly, then I think you're going to have to
account. But
if you take life and do it in the course of duty, and it is not in a selfish point of
view, then I think it's a different case. That kind of wrongful death is
excusable.
What was the epiphany, the turning point for you in going against the corrupt
government?
The real turning point I think, the real shock I had was when I came out of Burma in
1987 there was a phone call waiting for me. We were in a safe house in Minister's
quadrangle of Bangkok, Thailand. A Major Chuck Johnson was listening in; never take phone
calls unless we're on a mission, for this very reason. Two state department agents that
had gone to a friend of mine, Joe Felter, a former CEO of Wedtech, and he relayed their
message when he said to me, "Bo, you must erase and forget everything that you've
learned in the Golden Triangle. If you don't you're going to hurt the
government." Well, Joe was trying to keep me from being killed. He
said, "Bo, you've got to get on
the first thing smoking out of there, you've got to bring everything you got back here to
the apartment," which was a safe house we've got, and I said, "Who's going to be
there?" He said, "just Tom Harvey and myself." Tom Harvey was our White
House National Security Council contact, and the person I first turned [Khun
Sa]
videotapes over to just before Christmas the year before. Suddenly I found myself not just
in the shadows struggling against some unseen bureaucratic enemy - we always had
that. We
never had the money we needed to do the mission, we always had to scrounge and work on our
own. That's what causes a lot of this drug trafficking, by the way. You get an
enthusiastic CIA operative who like Ollie North is going to do the job. But they can't
give him the money. And so they say, "Don't tell us how you do it. Just do
it."
Then you have all these druggies already in place, this is what Special Forces was trained
to do. Don't go out and reinvent the wheel. You already have organised
crime, do you not,
that is highly successful against what? The very thing you are trying to
avoid, the authorities, in this case. So you use them, and they're more than happy to pay the bill
for the guns as long as the planes come back full and don't just dead-head back into
Homestead Air Force Base.
So I found myself not in the shadows, but found myself out in the
open, not in verbal
judo but in real terms, where the government, my government, was saying, "You erase
and you forget or we're going to bury you." What do you do? Well, as an officer I've
taken orders all my life since I was a cadet at fourteen-years-old. I had been conditioned
to take orders. But being in Special Forces helped me because we are a different
army, we
march to a different drummer. Oftimes there is no one to give us orders. We are given a
mission and are left alone and it may be years later until on our own we are able to
accomplish that mission. It allowed me to become more self-reliant, more independent in my
own thought than just blindly following some staff puke in Washington.
D.C. Had I been a
West Point officer, I probably would have clicked my heels, because that's like Tom
Harvey, and I would have marched in their direction. But instead it made me
angry. Here we
had an opportunity to clear up some government bureaucracy that was obviously
corrupt. And
yet the White House was not just dragging its feet but they were threatening
me. They came
down real hard because they were desperate.
So it's not just renegade agents but orders from up on
top?
Listen, there are a lot of things I know now that weren't in my mind at that
time. Tom
Harvey and Richard Armitage are close friends. Richard Armitage was the Assistant
Secretary of Defense. George Bush appointed him Assistant Secretary of State and then
Secretary of the Army, but he was close friends with Harvey, they used to lift weights all
the time at the Pentagon Officers' Athletic Club. I betcha this happened. When I brought
those videotapes in, it was natural that Harvey probably called Dick
Armitage, who was
responsible for recovery of POWs, over to his office. When Khun Sa said he was going to
reveal the U.S. officials, and if it was true Armitage was involved, jeez, Armitage was
probably dripping in his knickers. This would have frightened him. Who authorized Armitage
to do this? Again, Armitage and von Marbod - it all comes back to a nice, tight little
circle. These guys didn't do it on their own initiative. And so when you go way back and
look at Nixon and Armitage and von Marbod, where did they all come
together? In 1973 we
got out with honor under with Nixon before he got run out with Watergate, but then in
1975, even though we didn't have Tricky Dick anymore, we had the same
bureaucracy. Now you
had Armitage and von Marbod over in Vietnam taking out all the classified and all the very
valuable weapons systems. Armitage took his to the Philippines and von Marbod took a lot
of his into Thailand. These were cashed. Now what were they cashed for? Because the
guerrilla cannot eat money, they can't put it down the barrel of a gun, they want stuff
they can use. And so did we ever stop the war in Vietnam? We didn't. We didn't have any
money, but that didn't make any difference as long as we had guns and the
wherewithal. To
keep this engine going takes some fuel. Money is the fuel. And of course, dope is
money.
And then you had guns. What they had on their side, in the
hills, they had the dope. We
didn't want to make this a one-way trip, because if Armitage and von Marbod had just given
them the guns that they had cached from the Vietnam war, then they might have not been
able to replace them. Eventually they would have run out. So what they did
then, I believe
- it's good business practice, like Secord has said - we said, "You give us the dope
and we'll give you the guns," and the dope is transferred into money. Where did the
Contras get their guns from? They got them ultimately from the Israelis. The Israelis
captured massive amounts of arms from the Yom Kippur War and the Six Day
War, and they
were selling these guns - plus the Israelis could arm them through the communist
block,
where we couldn't. And so we were dealing through the Mossad to dealing weapons to the
Contras. But drugs seems to be a denominator. It allows for re-supply, so it doesn't run
out.
You trained Special Forces that went into Jonestown? What was the precise nature of
the operation?
I don't know precisely because it was a compartmentalized
operation. The only thing
that I do know for certain is what the Sergeant I quote coming out of
Jonestown, he was
insistent because he was disgusted, on writing this book. He was, without
compromise,
going to call it 'All the Niggers Are Dead'. I asked him, "Why would you want to
entitle anything such an offensive way?" He said, "It doesn't make a difference
what your color, your creed, your sex," he said, "when you are treated the way
they were, that's what you are, you're a nigger, you're nothing else." I think that
those soldiers saw things that affected them and made them very angry. I've seen other
things like that in combat where there have been abuses. I wrote about one of them in my
book where the Captain tortured the young girl severely and the young Sergeant put on a
swastika and said "If I'm going to act like a Nazi I'm going to look like
one."
I think that the same kind of negative impact occurred in Jonestown. A few weeks ago there
was a report out of Montreal about people winning cases against the CIA because they were
utterly abused in the mental health clinic that was set up by the CIA in
Canada. That all
came down under Allen Dulles tried to make a Manchurian Candidate. I think the Jonestown
incident was an extension of In Search of the Manchurian Candidate, I think those people
were conditioned to act in certain ways and would have probably just moved from Montreal
to Guyana, in this case. You look at Jim Jones' background carefully, he had a lot of
intelligence contact there for doing exactly what he did.
Did it go haywire?
Of course it went haywire. God be praised, just like the Montreal Health
Institute, it
self-destructs because it's not good in its essence. Most of these folks involved were
street people, so they didn't have people who knew where they were or were concerned about
their well-being. It escalated once they killed congressman Leo J. Ryan;
basically, they
had no other way to go, so they just tried to self-destruct the whole
mission. And that
means the death of hundreds of people. As I point out in the book, the medical examiner
there made some startling statements, and we wouldn't even allow the bodies to be properly
examined when they were brought back in to the East Coast and turned in. So obviously it
was a cover-up. Jonestown I think was an extension of Mk-Ultra from the CIA and there are
probably other experiments going on.
Were Special Forces down there as it went haywire?
No, I think the Special Forces units were pulled together as an exterminator after it
had reached a point where they had to destroy the evidence. Those teams were called on
many times. We had what we called Disaster Area survey teams. They were put together and
designed and to leave on a moment's notice. If you had an earthquake, and there were many
of them in Managua, Nicaragua, Guatemala, you instantly dispatch those
teams. Special
Forces teams were trained to go into these areas and to be dropped in by
helicopter,
rappel if needs be, or parachute, and work their way back and make
surveys. In this case
instead of surveying for physical, meaning nature's, damage, they were surveying for human
presence and mop up any that might have escaped.
Allen Dulles is dead, but that doesn't mean that the idea of controlling people's minds
and behavior is dead, and I still think that is a goal. And when you look at what I
believe is a tilt for Global Government you see where that would be even more intensified
now. We had gas, for example, this was way back in the late 50s, early 60s, we had gas
that you could use that could completely change people's desire to fight or to
flee. The
army's chemical-biological warfare research labs, I think that kind of stuff still goes
on. They have to have human guinea pigs to practice on because animals other than human do
not produce the kind of comprehensive results that they need. So when it comes down to
human behavior, they probably take street people. There are kids missing off the streets
of America every year. Some of them may end up being sold for body parts down in
Guadalajara, Mexico, and a few other places for rich people who don't want to wait in line
for organ transplants. And some of them undoubtedly end up in Satanic
rituals. But many of
these ritualistic abuses may really be governmental operations. I think MK-Ultra exists
today.
The foregoing 'interview' is abridged from a much more comprehensive piece, with
commentary, that appears in Adam Parfrey's book Cult Rapture. Mr.
Parfrey's interview should in no way be construed as an endorsement of Bo Gritz or any of
his theories. For further information on Cult Rapture write to the
publisher, Feral House, PO Box 3466, Portland, Oregon 97208-3466, USA. Web Site:
http://www.feralhouse.com/